Advertisements

Women’s News: Google’s Megan Smith On The 2 Innovations That Will Get More Women Into Tech

DLDwomen Conference 2011 - Day 2

The Huffington Post  |  By 

Could two simple innovations bridge the gender gap in tech jobs? VP of Google[x], Megan Smith, thinks so.

Women 2.0 — an organization that aims to “increase the number of female founders of technology startups with inspiration, information and education” — recently announced the speakers for their annual conference, which will focus on how women in tech can further advance by 2020. A number of impressive thought-leaders will take the stage at the event and share their visions, including Smith, the conference’s keynote speaker.

Though Smith has made it to the top of the tech industry, her high-ranking position as a woman is hardly standard in the field. In a July 19th interview with Women 2.0 editor Jessica Stillman published on Forbes, Smith spoke about the future of women in tech, revealing the two innovations she believes will get more women involved in the field by 2020.

According to Smith, the first step towards narrowing the gender divide in tech is to teach technology-related material in class while girls are still young. In fact, failing to require tech-based curriculum leaves the U.S. behind other countries. Smith told Forbes:

There are several places in Vietnam where they’re teaching computer science from second grade in class, so they don’t have a gender divide because everybody is expected to program. By 11th grade kids are doing Google interview-level solutions. We need to have making, including computer science, shop, etc. as part of the core curriculum from the beginning, not just an optional afterschool thing. Things like First Robotics and all of those great programs need to become mainstream.

But getting tech-based curricula in classrooms across the country is hardly enough. The way we teach STEM-related topics, Smith said, makes all the difference:

Math has been taught a particular way for a very long time. Fine, but it pulls the same small subset of kids into mathematics. We have two boys, and one of our kids is much more interested in history and stories, so if you want him to do some calculations about lenses you would start talking to him about Galileo…Then he would be into the lenses, but if you just start talking to him about lenses he might not stay with you. Each kid is unique in what captures their attention and their passion.

For more of Smith’s thoughts on how the tech industry will evolve over the rest of the decade, read the entire interview on Forbes.

Read More:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/19/megan-smith-google-innovations-women-tech_n_3623954.html?utm_hp_ref=women&ir=Women

Advertisements

Comments

  1. They Call Me Jane says:

    Reblogged this on Inspiration in a Box and commented:
    Interesting. Though in my blog on grades I argue that higher maths really needn’t be compulsory. In my view, creating a more customized education based on people’s interests, and also making things interesting, not compulsory, would surely help the cause just as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: